In his weekly radio address today, George W. Bush tried to sell us on some reasons why we should keep our troops in Iraq.
His rhetoric reminded me of a Lewis Carroll story.
Below I quote some of his reasons (i.e., excuses), along with my responses.
-----
Bush: "To begin to bring troops home before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for our country. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al-Qaeda"
Me: Whose fault is this? al-Qaeda didn't have a presence in Iraq until we invaded that country and bombed it back to the Stone Age. Also consider the fact that al-Qaeda can thrive in Iraq only if the Iraqi people and the Iraqi government choose not to interfere with their activity.
-----
Bush: "risking a humanitarian catastrophe,"
Me: There's already a humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq, and it's Bush's fault.
-----
Bush: "and allowing the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq and gain control of vast oil resources they could use to fund new attacks on America."
Me: In this same radio address today, Bush admitted that one of the Iraqi government's missed benchmarks was their failures to "pass a law to share oil revenues." And, of course, terrorists already have a safe haven in Iraq, thanks to Bush for invading that country and thereby fueling al-Qaeda's interest in Iraq, and then leaving the Iraqi borders so porous as to make it extremely easy for al-Qaeda to slip in (or pour in, as the case may be).
-----
Bush: "And it would increase the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous."
Me: In other words, we haven't learned from our mistakes.
-----
Enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment