
According to Mary A. Fischer at SCOTUSblog, Skinner's attorney at the original trial chose not to test some available evidence, fearing that it would further implicate his client. So the prosecution maintains that Skinner had his chance to use that evidence and blew it.
To me, that's not a good reason to risk executing an innocent person. Testing the DNA evidence can't hurt. I hope the Supreme Court will agree.
Stay tuned for updates.
>> For more information: hankskinner.org
No comments:
Post a Comment