03 November 2005

Bob Herbert: "Secrets and Shame"

From Bob Herbert's column in today's New York Times:
-----
Ultimately the whole truth will come out and historians will have their say, and Americans will look in the mirror and be ashamed.

Abraham Lincoln spoke of the "better angels" of our nature. George W. Bush will have none of that. He's set his sights much, much lower.

The latest story from the Dante-esque depths of this administration was front-page news in The Washington Post yesterday. The reporter, Dana Priest, gave us the best glimpse yet of the extent of the secret network of prisons in which the CIA has been hiding and interrogating terror suspects. The network includes a facility at a Soviet-era compound in Eastern Europe.

"The hidden global internment network is a central element in the CIA's unconventional war on terrorism," wrote Ms. Priest. "It depends on the cooperation of foreign intelligence services, and on keeping even basic information about the system secret from the public, foreign officials and nearly all members of Congress charged with overseeing the CIA's covert actions."

The individuals held in these prisons have been deprived of all rights. They don't even have the basic minimum safeguards of prisoners of war. If they are being tortured or otherwise abused, there is no way for the outside world to know about it. If some mistake has been made and they are, in fact, innocent of wrongdoing - too bad.

As Ms. Priest wrote, "Virtually nothing is known about who is kept in the facilities, what interrogation methods are employed with them, or how decisions are made about whether they should be detained or for how long."

This is the border along which democracy bleeds into tyranny.

Some of the prisoners being held by the CIA are no doubt murderous individuals who, given the opportunity, would do tremendous harm. There are others, however, whose links to terrorist activities are dubious at best, and perhaps nonexistent.
-----
[Read more.]

1 comment:


  1. The left just seems to get
    more excited about anything
    when death is on the table.
    I don't know what it is, whether
    it's disaster death or war death
    or society deciding we're going
    to off some of our fellow citizens,
    they get ginned up about it, really
    get excited about the death aspect.
    But, but, you start talking about life
    and somehow they just don't have
    as much interest in that, as though
    it is enlightened to understand that
    it's some people's duty to die and
    get out of the way, and that not
    everybody has a right to life. It
    depends on what somebody
    else wants. So I am continually
    amazed at the left.

    ReplyDelete