05 November 2005

Bush's defective moral compass

A vote for Bush's "moral values" was a vote for torture, lies, and intolerance.

From Cathleen Falsani, Religion Writer for the Chicago Sun-Times:
-----
The morning after George W. Bush won his second term in office and many of his Republican colleagues also claimed victory last year, I received an e-mail from one of my dearest friends, Amanda.

It's a note that has haunted me since, a niggling at the back of my mind like an overdue library book or an insult hurled in anger that can't ever be taken back properly.

Amanda is one of the most moral, ethical, intelligent and kind people I know. She also happens to be a Jewish atheist, more or less.

We've known each other since we were teenagers, and the subject of faith -- the peculiarity of my born-again-ness and the absence of her faith in any religious way -- had been a perennial topic of discussion. I respect her deeply and care about what she thinks, particularly about spiritual matters.

"Help!" was the title of Amanda's e-mail. "I'm sad and angry today," she began. "Given your profession and your personal belief system, I am genuinely hoping you have something to say on this: How can people who claim to be voting on religious and moral values vote for a man who . . ."

Then she listed what she believed were President Bush's offenses:

*He supports the death penalty. He claims to be humble and ask for God's guidance, yet seemingly refuses to admit his infallibility or take advice from those who might have helped him avoid dragging us into an unjust war.

*He reversed the civilized world's abhorrence of preemptive war. He sold Americans a war based on lies. He willingly started an unnecessary war that has resulted in the deaths of (now more than 2,000) American soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

*He, at least tacitly, condones torture. (Guantanamo Bay. Abu Ghraib. And, we learned earlier this week, perhaps a number of secret CIA-run locations in Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia and elsewhere.) He ignores the human race's responsibility for preserving the Earth and its creatures.

*He is against stem cell research. He accuses dissenters of degrading the U.S. troops but does not push to fully fund Veterans Administration hospitals or health insurance for veterans. And he allowed the automatic assault weapons ban to lapse.

"How are these things reflective of a man with strong 'morals?' " Amanda asked. "How does 'morals' get to be defined as the things the right wants it to be? . . . Why isn't being anti-death penalty a moral issue? Why isn't being anti-war a moral issue? Why isn't being supportive of civil unions so that gay couples can, for example, obtain health insurance for each other and their children a moral issue?
-----
[Read more.]

1 comment:

  1. Been reading your blog, though i dont agree with most and wouldnt of even posted until i read your friends email. Very funny! Obviously your friend should read the bible if she is going to try to condone someone based on his believe or rather non adherence to his religion. Death penalty is obviuosly mentioned numerous times in the bible. This is moral and just. Homosexuality is obviously contrary to most christians believe. Marriage was established in the bible. (according to christians) So why would Bush allow for gay marriage, when christians believe it to be sinful?
    Those are my comments on that. The rest is typical unsubstantiated liberal banter not worth addressing. My question is what would she have perfered. A guy who served in veitnam but then met with the communist leaders we were at war with to try to spread their communist message here(making him a traitor. A guy that his own platoon was against being pres. The same guy that built his whole political career around treason. That is better? I think not.

    ReplyDelete