15 May 2009

Human Rights Watch weighs in on Obama's torture photo flip-flop

This morning I was preparing to write about my thoughts on President Obama's recent decision to block the release of some additional photos that show U.S. troops abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Last month Obama had agreed to release those photos as mandated by an appeals court ruling per a Freedom of Information Act request by the ACLU. But now he's going to fight it, alleging that the photos would "further inflame anti-American opinion" and endanger U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Excuse me, Mr. President, but the world is already aware of how we have tortured and, in some cases, killed our prisoners in Bush's "war on terror". Hiding the new pictures isn't going to change that fact. It will only make it worse. It will make it look as though we've got more dirty little secrets that we're not willing to own up to.

That said, while doing my research for this piece, I came upon a news release from Human Rights Watch (HRW), which the group issued on Wednesday after learning of Obama's unfortunate change of mind. It very effectively conveys some of my own thoughts on various aspects of the issue. So I'll now turn this soap box over to HRW.

Below is the full text of the release:
US: Reversal on Torture Photos a Blow to Openness, Accountability

May 13, 2009

(Washington, DC) - President Barack Obama's decision to block the release of photos depicting the abuse of detainees in US custody in Iraq and Afghanistan strikes a blow to transparency and accountability, Human Rights Watch said today.

"We understand President Obama's concern about protecting US military personnel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, but the real danger comes not from the knowledge that abuse happened but the sense that those responsible for planning and authorizing it haven't been held accountable," said Stacy Sullivan, counterterrorism adviser at Human Rights Watch.

The photos, believed to number as many as 2,000, are part of detainee abuse cases the military investigated between 2001 and 2005. They reportedly depict US military personnel humiliating and otherwise mistreating detainees. A federal judge ordered them released by May 28 as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The Obama administration initially supported the release of the photos, but reversed course on Tuesday, May 12, after top US military commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan told Obama they feared the release of the photos could endanger US troops. The administration now plans to appeal the judge's ruling to release the photos.

President Obama stated today that the soldiers depicted in these pictures engaging in conduct not authorized by the US Army Field Manual had been investigated and sanctioned, suggesting that the underlying problem had therefore been addressed. However, the administration appears to have ruled out taking any action against the senior military and civilian officials who authorized such conduct.

"In the Bush era, abuse was a policy dictated from the top down, but just about the only people who were punished were the privates and sergeants who had the misfortune of appearing in photographs," said Sullivan. "It would be tragic if the Obama administration accepted that outcome."

Human Rights Watch has called for prosecution of those responsible for authorizing and ordering detainee mistreatment, as well as a commission of inquiry into the full extent of post-9/11 abuses.
I call for it too, along with the prompt release of the photos. After all, Obama campaigned on the promise of more openness and transparency in government.

But I shall not hold my breath.

No comments:

Post a Comment